Matrix High Speed Steels Technology Site
                                                         Economic Alternative to Powders
 

      
Home  |  Technology News  |  White Paper FAQ  |  Contact Us
 
 
White Paper Index
Table of Contents 
Synopsis  
1. Introduction 
2. Background 
3. Development
4. DRM Steel Features
5. Applications
6. Conclusions
References
Supplemental Materials

Dream Steels:
DRM1
DRM2
DRM3

The Development of High Hard and 
Tough Matrix Type High Speed Tool Steels 

By SHUN-SUKE NAKAHAMA*1, YUKINORI MATSUDA*2, KUNIO NAMIKI*3, KOZO OZAKI*4

4. Special features of DRM steels (continued)

4.2 Properties of DRM1 and DRM2

Heat treatment conditions of DRM1 and 2 are recommended as shown in Fig. 16. It should be noted in quenching of DRM1 that quenching rate below 5000C should be large to maintain high toughness by suppressing lower Bainitic transformation. The austenitizing temperature for DRM2 should be lower than 11 200C to prevent austenite grain coarsening resulting in low toughness.


The tempering hardness curves of DRM1 and DRM2 are shown in Fig. 17. DRM 1 shows higher hardness than that of hot work die steel AISI 1413. DRM2 shows higher than conventional MHS steel, MH85.

Charpy impact values of DRM steels are shown in Fig. 18. DRM 1 and 2 exhibit higher values than those of cold work die steels such as AISI D2 and Daido's DC53 and conventional MHS steel MH85. Microfractographs taken from the Charpy impact specimens of DRM1 and MH85 are shown in Fig.19. As we have intended, it is confirmed that there observed coarse VC carbides at the crack origin in MH85, but no ones in DRM1.

Fatigue test results, the relation between the applied stress and the numbers of cycles to fracture, are shown in Fig.20. Rotating bending fatigue tests were carried out by using smooth specimens. DRM1 and 2 show higher fatigue strength than MH85. As confirmed in Charpy impact specimens, microfractography also reveals that there is no coarse carbides at fatigue crack origin in DRM1 and 2 as well.

Heat checking test was conducted to evaluate the thermal fatigue properties. The test methods are schematically shown in Fig.2 1. This is accelerated test. A small specimen is repeatedly induction heated up to 7000C and cooled by water. Then, a specimen is cut at a half thickness and the cross section is ground and polished. The number and the depth of cracks are measured. The shallower crack and the less number of cracks mean the better heat checking resistance. The test results are shown in Fig.22. The maximum crack length of DRMI and DRM2 is shallower than that of MH85 and AISI H13, which means the superiority of the new grades to conventional steels.

Tempering softening resistance is the other important property for forging die steels. Test specimens, heat treated to the hardness 55 to 6OHRC in advance, were held at 6500C for up to lOhr and the hardness change was measured as shown in Fig.23. DRM1 shows higher hardness than MH85 and H13. DRM2 is almost equivalent to MH85 but superior to H13.

<PREV  |  TABLE OF CONTENTS  |  NEXT>

 


International Mold Steel, Inc.
6796 Powerline Drive
Florence, KY 41042 USA
Tel: (859) 342-6000 or 1-800-625-6653
Fax: (859) 342-6006
Literature: info@imsteel.com
Sales Desk:
salesdesk@imsteel.com
Web: www.imsteel.com

 

Copyright © 2006-2008 International Mold Steel
Web published by Marketing Options